They choose to ignore many things in this assertion. Among them:
- The debt due to this unsustainable spending has surpassed the GDP and will be harder and harder to roll-over. The debt will saddle the People with much higher interest rates in the future. Any attempt to increase taxes to pay the increased debt payments and the increases in Medicare, Social Security (retirement and disability), Medicaid, and ObamaCare spending, will slow the growth of the economy enough to result in a decrease in tax revenues. In other words, only spending less is a possible sustainable solution. This solution is to be avoided at all costs according to Democrats.
- It is the job of Congress, especially the House of Representatives, to carefully review spending and only authorize that spending which is constitutional and necessary. This constitutional responsibility is forfeited in the continuing resolution process. Only in a piecemeal consideration of government program funding will irresponsible, unnecessary, and unconstitutional programs be ended as they ought to be. Programs should be examined closely by Congress. This takes time and effort, which it is all too clear Congress is not up to. Neither is Obama up to it. This is a great reason to demand huge reductions in government spending and in the number of programs all by itself. Giving Congress so much money and so many programs is like giving a five-year-old a house, a gun, and a car of his own and filling the house to the ceiling with hundred dollar bills.
- The infamously named Affordable Care Act is very unpopular with the People. It is a major source of increased government spending. This spending will add greatly to the national debt. Many will push for higher taxes to fund it in the future, despite the fact that higher taxes will result in less tax revenue over time, while lowering our standard of living. Of course a past Congress passed ObamaCare without reading it and without regard to its many violations of individual rights and of the limited powers given the government by the Constitution. This does not mean that the present or future Congresses are not obliged to stop the funding for this program if they assess it to be unworthy of funding, unconstitutional, or against the will of the People. Indeed, if any is the case, then it is Congress' responsibility to stop the program.