Showing posts with label Robert Romano. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert Romano. Show all posts
11 August 2013
Americans On Medical Care Subsidies Under ObamaCare
It is important to know how many Americans will be receiving government subsidies for medical care once ObamaCare takes effect in a few months. I was looking at a article by Robert Romano, the Senior Editor of Americans for Limited Government. His article is Why Obamacare always was a public option. Unfortunately, I found upon examining this article more closely, that his numbers do not add up. The outcome is worse than his totals imply. [See Robert Romano's comment below. He has set me straight on the errors I will correct in brackets below.]
Unemployed and Given Up on Finding Employment = 22 million
Pregnant Women, Disabled, and Nursing Home People on Medicaid now = 27 million
Children on Medicaid now = 31 million
Medicare Enrolled = 49 million
Workers making $45,960 or less, new under ObamaCare = 113 million [counts those adults already enrolled on Medicaid and Would-be Workers who are Unemployed]
Total Number of Medical-Expense Subsidized Americans = 242 million [- 22 - 27 million = 193 million, as Robert Romano wrote]
To be sure, there may be some people in more than one of these categories. A few people who are unemployed may already be on Medicaid. People in nursing homes may be enrolled in Medicare. The total is probably a bit lower than 242 [193] million then. However, some of the unemployed not on Medicaid have children and they will be in families receiving subsidies and therefor benefiting. The U.S. population now is 316 million.
242/316 = 0.766 [193/316 = 0.611],
so it appears that [three-fifths] of Americans will be getting subsidized medical care!
How is the remaining two-fifths of Americans supposed to sustain this burden? Should we not expect that many of them will be drawn under as the costs are put on their backs more and more? This burden will actually increase the number of poor in America and hence those eligible for subsidies.
While getting subsidized medical care, many college graduates over 26 years old with jobs will soon not only be paying their unforgivable student loans, but will also be paying a fortune for health insurance at costs to provide for the very sick and older people or fined a minimum of $695 a year for not having expensive government-approved health insurance. Those without jobs will also be fined $675 a year for not having insurance, which means almost all of such unemployed people will have to apply for the government subsidies. Your life will be hard, but if you voted for Obama, it will be a just consequence. Life is commonly hard on the irrational. The exception is the irrational members of Congress who voted for ObamaCare or who have failed to defund it and who are being allowed to escape its draconian provisions in a most unlawful manner.
Unemployed and Given Up on Finding Employment = 22 million
Pregnant Women, Disabled, and Nursing Home People on Medicaid now = 27 million
Children on Medicaid now = 31 million
Medicare Enrolled = 49 million
Workers making $45,960 or less, new under ObamaCare = 113 million [counts those adults already enrolled on Medicaid and Would-be Workers who are Unemployed]
Total Number of Medical-Expense Subsidized Americans = 242 million [- 22 - 27 million = 193 million, as Robert Romano wrote]
To be sure, there may be some people in more than one of these categories. A few people who are unemployed may already be on Medicaid. People in nursing homes may be enrolled in Medicare. The total is probably a bit lower than 242 [193] million then. However, some of the unemployed not on Medicaid have children and they will be in families receiving subsidies and therefor benefiting. The U.S. population now is 316 million.
242/316 = 0.766 [193/316 = 0.611],
so it appears that [three-fifths] of Americans will be getting subsidized medical care!
How is the remaining two-fifths of Americans supposed to sustain this burden? Should we not expect that many of them will be drawn under as the costs are put on their backs more and more? This burden will actually increase the number of poor in America and hence those eligible for subsidies.
While getting subsidized medical care, many college graduates over 26 years old with jobs will soon not only be paying their unforgivable student loans, but will also be paying a fortune for health insurance at costs to provide for the very sick and older people or fined a minimum of $695 a year for not having expensive government-approved health insurance. Those without jobs will also be fined $675 a year for not having insurance, which means almost all of such unemployed people will have to apply for the government subsidies. Your life will be hard, but if you voted for Obama, it will be a just consequence. Life is commonly hard on the irrational. The exception is the irrational members of Congress who voted for ObamaCare or who have failed to defund it and who are being allowed to escape its draconian provisions in a most unlawful manner.
11 June 2010
Romano: The Iron Fist of the EPA and the Democrat Congress
Robert Romano, Senior Editor of the Americans for Limited Government News Bureau, has written a 10 June 2010 post on the ALG blog with some ass-kicking bite:
Not a single Republican voted against the Murkowski resolution to block the EPA from its absurd ruling that CO2 is a pollutant, but 53 Democrat lunatics did.
This is rule by an iron fist.
Yesterday, the Senate had an opportunity to overturn a tyrannical usurpation by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) classifying carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases as harmful pollutants under the terms of the Clean Air Act. Sadly, Senator Lisa Murkowski’s resolution failed by a vote of 47-53, leaving the agency in the command-and-control position to set the nation’s energy policy with arbitrary limits on carbon emissions.
This basically means that the EPA is now free and clear to set as draconian restrictions on energy usage as it wants. Which will mean higher energy prices, lost jobs, lost business, and the blind imposition of a radical, environmentalist agenda upon an unwilling American populace.
In short, the Senate has affirmed the EPA’s singular authority to turn out the lights.I hope you can see why I like this Americans for Limited Government blog.
Not a single Republican voted against the Murkowski resolution to block the EPA from its absurd ruling that CO2 is a pollutant, but 53 Democrat lunatics did.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)