Showing posts with label racists. Show all posts
Showing posts with label racists. Show all posts
25 September 2010
Obama Justice Department Will Not Enforce Law with Racial Impartiality
Long ago, J. Christian Adams, left the Justice Department because his case to prosecute two New Black Panther Party members for voter intimidation in the 2010 elections was set aside by higher officials in the Obama administration Justice Department. He has said over and over that this was because the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department will not enforce The Voter Rights Act in a racially neutral way. They are only willing to prosecute white intimidators for interfering with the voting rights of black Americans. According to the Obama Justice Department, white voters do not have an equal right to vote. This last week, Christopher Coates, a senior attorney still with the Justice Department, testified that this was the case and added information on earlier cases against black intimidators the Civil Rights Division of the Justice Department will not prosecute. The Civil Rights Division is run and controlled by racists. There is no other term for this.
16 September 2010
9/12 Demonstrators Strike Terror in Progressive Elitists
On Sunday, 12 September 2010, I and my wife Anna joined the 9/12 demonstrators before the Capitol to protest against big government, wild, insane spending, and massive violations of the rights of the individual. The crowd, on a rainy, wet day, was large, but not so large as at the 9/12 demonstration of a one year ago. I suspect that many people stayed home to work to get Tea Party candidates elected to office. Others, most likely learned from their earlier attempts that the current politicians in Washington, few of whom were there due to the election coming up in November, are so contemptuous of the people they rule, that they have no interest in the people's thoughts and concerns. Therefore, it is wisest simply to toss them out of office. Still, the crowd was large and I observed it from about 1 PM to about 4:30 PM. I took 246 photos of demonstrators and will present some of those here.
Of course, we have from the good authority of the socialist media that such people as these demonstrators are racists, ignorant rednecks, neo-Nazis, all radical, intolerant Christian bullies, homophobes, immigrant haters, and violent beyond belief. Let us examine some pictures of these people who would strike terror in the hearts of any civilized human being:
"Our Founding Fathers Warned Against National Debt," hmmm.... is that a well-known Nazi saying or what? "We Can't Afford You." Perhaps being too poor to be a good Nazi socialist is just a redneck thing. Notice the many military-like uniforms, the blackjacks, the hobnailed boots, and the raised arms. We would see the fangs, except everyone is looking in the direction of a speaker, probably a Hitler-like harranger and demagogue.
This gray-haired woman under an umbrella looks mighty threatening. Quite interesting that on a rainy day she had the creativity to use her umbrella as a protest sign. If she gets her hands on the controls of government, we had better watch out. She will be a formidable foe to the Progressive agenda. ObamaCare = Slavery and Got Personal Responsibility? How could you be more threatening?
This smiling lady did not look sufficiently threatening to be holding such a subversive sign. Imagine someone sending the message that people should read Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged. Imagine telling people it is OK to be concerned about their own self-interest and to act on it. Then there is all that horrible stuff about legitimate government from the American Declaration of Independence and even a notion that people have rights not granted to them by a beneficent government in the Bill of Rights. Imagine calling our Mommy Dearest government a tyranny and illegitimate! That it spends 70% of its expenditures unconstitutionally. So, I investigated and found that she was simply holding the sign for a husband who was running around the demonstration taking pictures. He is, no doubt, the evil one. Then note also that the umbrella lady has also enjoined you to Work Harder: Millions on Welfare are Depending on You.
Here we have someone scaring the children, babies even, with the idea that their debt is huge. How much kinder it would be to leave the baby in innocence until it discovers how much debt it owes, say, after graduating from college. At least we know the government-run schools and the progressive colleges will not scare them with such hoary facts! They are so kind and thoughtful, but not these wicked people!
How uncouth to imply that a Congressional Democrat is a socialist? How can anyone complain about the government pulling money out of their wallets when they are doing so much good with while paying off Obama's supporters and enlisting them as special interests so they will support socialist policies? Oops, I meant to say so they would support forward-thinking Progressive policies with central planning by the Mommy State to take care of those many, many Americans who are so helpless and pitifully in need.
Oh, another Uncle Tom. Ahh.... maybe not. He is probably a poor homeless, uneducated man who can't even read the sign he is holding. Those nasty protesters probably paid him so much to hold that sign that he just couldn't resist. This just demonstrates once again how right the Progressives are in knowing very well that black Americans are incapable of choosing their own values and living their own lives. Look how they are just so vulnerable to the manipulations of the worst elements in our society. We elitists must remember it is not his fault. This is why we have a very, very big government: To take care of him and to manipulate his vote before the nasty people do.
The woman in the wheelchair stood up briefly. This proves she is probably an assassin waiting for a black Congressman to pass by. You have to watch carefully for these sleeper terrorists that fill the ranks of the right-wing wingnuts.
Note the women with a young girl in the lower left. She is holding a baby. Is she just really, really irresponsible bringing these vulnerable innocents into the midst of these raving lunatic neo-Nazis? Or is she an even more cleverly disguised assassin? Note the sign quotes John Adams, that regressive firebrand of old, that claims that the Constitution is inadequate to a People who are not moral and religious. You know, he almost got that right. If he had said it is inadequate to a people who not moral, as we Progressives know no one is, and had left out the religious characteristic, he would have been a Progressive! Of course, we Progressive do welcome religious people if they subscribe to the Progressive social program and if they understand that the Constitution is inadequate.
"Stop Convolutin' our Constitution." My, she is even trying to sound like a redneck. Doesn't she understand even that the Constitution is a living instrument of the Progressive Program? What kind of education did she have? Surely, not one in a quality school such as all of our union and government controlled schools are! "Clean out Congress." That sounds as though she intends to attack Congress with an assault weapon!
Wow, these neo-Nazis sure are effective in recruiting women. This one is quite good-looking too, but I am sure her heart is black with evil. Because she hates her black heart, she probably hates her black President. Yes, that sounds like the right Progressive spin to put on this.
"Oust the Marxist Usurper! ...His Czars and Thugs! Honduras did it!" Wow, how extreme can you get. These people have probably been reading too much of the radical Charles Anderson! Why can't they understand that socialism will make everyone equal and provide for all their wants? Why can't they understand that the State has to use Force to Make People do the Right Thing? Why can't they understand the collective love of taking your neighbor's income and property and of making him give his time to community service. Sure, sometimes we have to send someone sort of rough around to take his income or his property. Sometimes we have to haul his retrograde ass off to jail because he would not obey the great will of the collective. Sometimes we have to shoot someone. But, mostly they get with the program and it is so good for everyone to be equally poor, except the elite leaders, who of course need to have more goodies than the rest so they can comfortably lead. The President should have fine suits, while the people are more moral if they wear rags.
Oh no. Apparently these three wandered into the midst of this dangerous, black-hating crowd by horrible accident. It is unlikely that they made it out alive. The wolves surely devoured them. Do you suppose that pink jug is full of acid? Gee, their bodies were probably not even found. Their bones were probably even dissolved. The werewolves probably drank all of their blood first. How awful. See why you blacks must always vote Democrat? We give you the best police protection and the best educations. We really take care of you. And you owe us. Never forget how much you owe us, the white Progressive elitists who put Obama into the symbolic Presidency. The real power is in Congress.
Well, enough of this Progressivist commentary. I saw no acts of violence and no angry arguments. There were a few sentiments that this is a Christian nation, one sign against abortion, but not really very much of that even. Mostly, the signs wanted less government, a constitutional government. I only saw one sign opposing the Victory Mosque at Ground Zero. As usual, the police were not needed, but the Progressive DC government and the Democrat Congress needed to pretend that they were. The people there were a cross-section of America with people of all races there. Yes, black Americans are in such thralldom to the Democrats, that they are underrepresented. But, I get the impression that more black Americans are beginning to think for themselves. There were rich and poor people. There were grandparents, parents, young adults, and children. You know, just your everyday group of terrorists. Well, actually that is what they are, because they are terrifying the Democrat, socialist Congress and their minion politicians all across America. Good for them. The People have Awakened and Risen. They want to cast off tyrannical government and replace it with a more constitutional, limited-power government, which respects their individual rights.
Of course, we have from the good authority of the socialist media that such people as these demonstrators are racists, ignorant rednecks, neo-Nazis, all radical, intolerant Christian bullies, homophobes, immigrant haters, and violent beyond belief. Let us examine some pictures of these people who would strike terror in the hearts of any civilized human being:
"Our Founding Fathers Warned Against National Debt," hmmm.... is that a well-known Nazi saying or what? "We Can't Afford You." Perhaps being too poor to be a good Nazi socialist is just a redneck thing. Notice the many military-like uniforms, the blackjacks, the hobnailed boots, and the raised arms. We would see the fangs, except everyone is looking in the direction of a speaker, probably a Hitler-like harranger and demagogue.
This gray-haired woman under an umbrella looks mighty threatening. Quite interesting that on a rainy day she had the creativity to use her umbrella as a protest sign. If she gets her hands on the controls of government, we had better watch out. She will be a formidable foe to the Progressive agenda. ObamaCare = Slavery and Got Personal Responsibility? How could you be more threatening?
This smiling lady did not look sufficiently threatening to be holding such a subversive sign. Imagine someone sending the message that people should read Ayn Rand and Atlas Shrugged. Imagine telling people it is OK to be concerned about their own self-interest and to act on it. Then there is all that horrible stuff about legitimate government from the American Declaration of Independence and even a notion that people have rights not granted to them by a beneficent government in the Bill of Rights. Imagine calling our Mommy Dearest government a tyranny and illegitimate! That it spends 70% of its expenditures unconstitutionally. So, I investigated and found that she was simply holding the sign for a husband who was running around the demonstration taking pictures. He is, no doubt, the evil one. Then note also that the umbrella lady has also enjoined you to Work Harder: Millions on Welfare are Depending on You.
Here we have someone scaring the children, babies even, with the idea that their debt is huge. How much kinder it would be to leave the baby in innocence until it discovers how much debt it owes, say, after graduating from college. At least we know the government-run schools and the progressive colleges will not scare them with such hoary facts! They are so kind and thoughtful, but not these wicked people!
How uncouth to imply that a Congressional Democrat is a socialist? How can anyone complain about the government pulling money out of their wallets when they are doing so much good with while paying off Obama's supporters and enlisting them as special interests so they will support socialist policies? Oops, I meant to say so they would support forward-thinking Progressive policies with central planning by the Mommy State to take care of those many, many Americans who are so helpless and pitifully in need.
Oh, another Uncle Tom. Ahh.... maybe not. He is probably a poor homeless, uneducated man who can't even read the sign he is holding. Those nasty protesters probably paid him so much to hold that sign that he just couldn't resist. This just demonstrates once again how right the Progressives are in knowing very well that black Americans are incapable of choosing their own values and living their own lives. Look how they are just so vulnerable to the manipulations of the worst elements in our society. We elitists must remember it is not his fault. This is why we have a very, very big government: To take care of him and to manipulate his vote before the nasty people do.
The woman in the wheelchair stood up briefly. This proves she is probably an assassin waiting for a black Congressman to pass by. You have to watch carefully for these sleeper terrorists that fill the ranks of the right-wing wingnuts.
Note the women with a young girl in the lower left. She is holding a baby. Is she just really, really irresponsible bringing these vulnerable innocents into the midst of these raving lunatic neo-Nazis? Or is she an even more cleverly disguised assassin? Note the sign quotes John Adams, that regressive firebrand of old, that claims that the Constitution is inadequate to a People who are not moral and religious. You know, he almost got that right. If he had said it is inadequate to a people who not moral, as we Progressives know no one is, and had left out the religious characteristic, he would have been a Progressive! Of course, we Progressive do welcome religious people if they subscribe to the Progressive social program and if they understand that the Constitution is inadequate.
"Stop Convolutin' our Constitution." My, she is even trying to sound like a redneck. Doesn't she understand even that the Constitution is a living instrument of the Progressive Program? What kind of education did she have? Surely, not one in a quality school such as all of our union and government controlled schools are! "Clean out Congress." That sounds as though she intends to attack Congress with an assault weapon!
Wow, these neo-Nazis sure are effective in recruiting women. This one is quite good-looking too, but I am sure her heart is black with evil. Because she hates her black heart, she probably hates her black President. Yes, that sounds like the right Progressive spin to put on this.
"Oust the Marxist Usurper! ...His Czars and Thugs! Honduras did it!" Wow, how extreme can you get. These people have probably been reading too much of the radical Charles Anderson! Why can't they understand that socialism will make everyone equal and provide for all their wants? Why can't they understand that the State has to use Force to Make People do the Right Thing? Why can't they understand the collective love of taking your neighbor's income and property and of making him give his time to community service. Sure, sometimes we have to send someone sort of rough around to take his income or his property. Sometimes we have to haul his retrograde ass off to jail because he would not obey the great will of the collective. Sometimes we have to shoot someone. But, mostly they get with the program and it is so good for everyone to be equally poor, except the elite leaders, who of course need to have more goodies than the rest so they can comfortably lead. The President should have fine suits, while the people are more moral if they wear rags.
Oh no. Apparently these three wandered into the midst of this dangerous, black-hating crowd by horrible accident. It is unlikely that they made it out alive. The wolves surely devoured them. Do you suppose that pink jug is full of acid? Gee, their bodies were probably not even found. Their bones were probably even dissolved. The werewolves probably drank all of their blood first. How awful. See why you blacks must always vote Democrat? We give you the best police protection and the best educations. We really take care of you. And you owe us. Never forget how much you owe us, the white Progressive elitists who put Obama into the symbolic Presidency. The real power is in Congress.
Well, enough of this Progressivist commentary. I saw no acts of violence and no angry arguments. There were a few sentiments that this is a Christian nation, one sign against abortion, but not really very much of that even. Mostly, the signs wanted less government, a constitutional government. I only saw one sign opposing the Victory Mosque at Ground Zero. As usual, the police were not needed, but the Progressive DC government and the Democrat Congress needed to pretend that they were. The people there were a cross-section of America with people of all races there. Yes, black Americans are in such thralldom to the Democrats, that they are underrepresented. But, I get the impression that more black Americans are beginning to think for themselves. There were rich and poor people. There were grandparents, parents, young adults, and children. You know, just your everyday group of terrorists. Well, actually that is what they are, because they are terrifying the Democrat, socialist Congress and their minion politicians all across America. Good for them. The People have Awakened and Risen. They want to cast off tyrannical government and replace it with a more constitutional, limited-power government, which respects their individual rights.
17 April 2009
Dept. of Homeland Security on Rightwing Extremism
The Washington Times ran an article by Audrey Hudson and Eli Lake on 14 April 2009 called "Federal agency warns of radicals on right." You can link from the article to the Office of Intelligence and Analysis assessment report itself, by the Extremism and Radicalization Branch, Homeland Environment Threat Analysis Division. This is actually a rather vague and strange report, as noteworthy for those reasons as for any reasons some of us may have concerns that we are being targeted by government for simply believing in the Constitution of the United States. It has become clear that the government itself believes in very little of the Constitution.
In its discussion of Key Findings, the report starts off by saying, "The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence." What a curious statement. The rightwing terrorists are not currently planning acts of violence. If they were doing so in the past, shouldn't they be in jail now? If some group is free and is not planning acts of violence, then how is it called a terrorist group? Is it a terrorist group because someone in government is afraid of some group? If a grassroots mother's club called for a decrease in government power by calling for a transfer of secondary education from the public sector to the private sector, would this put the fear of God in this government branch and qualify the mother's club to be called a terrorist group even though it was not calling for acts of violence?
Apparently, this is not just a badly worded sentence, because the second paragraph says
A footnote at the bottom of this Key Findings page sort of defines "rightwing extremism." It says
There are repeated statements of concern that rightwing extremists continue "to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures." Heck, there are a lot of people discussing these things. Is there some reason to believe that discussing these topics makes one dangerous?
The report notes
There is a lot of concern that rightwing extremists, whatever they actually may be, are having discussions about important issues and that they are exercising their right to bear arms. It seems that just the act of exercising your right to bear arms is almost alone considered reason to classify someone as a rightwing extremist. This means you are an extremist if you do nothing in violation of the Constitution. Yes, this is a bit odd. Apparently, you are a rightwing extremist if you oppose gun restrictions such as the Brady Law or think that federal law enforcement mishandled the confrontations at Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.
Then there is the section called "Disgruntled Military Veterans", which I have been since the Democrat Congress stopped supporting South Vietnam, leaving it to fall to North Vietnam and the lives of 56,000 Americans to go for nought, not to mention many more good South Vietnamese. We disgruntled returning soldier's need special watching as enemies of the state.
While "rightwing extremist" was not well-defined, it appears that I clearly am considered a rightwing extremist. Hopefully considered one who is not currently planning violence against the hugely arrogant and overblown federal government or state and local governments. I hope they recognize that I am simply executing my rights to freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition, and my property rights. But despite all that, I am to be watched closely as a rightwing extremist because racists and small government people are assumed by our government to be in a state of near kinship. Thanks government. I'm going to add that to my list of grievances! I sure do not trust you anti-Constitutionalist tyrant running dogs either.
In its discussion of Key Findings, the report starts off by saying, "The DHS/Office of Intelligence and Analysis (I&A) has no specific information that domestic rightwing terrorists are currently planning acts of violence." What a curious statement. The rightwing terrorists are not currently planning acts of violence. If they were doing so in the past, shouldn't they be in jail now? If some group is free and is not planning acts of violence, then how is it called a terrorist group? Is it a terrorist group because someone in government is afraid of some group? If a grassroots mother's club called for a decrease in government power by calling for a transfer of secondary education from the public sector to the private sector, would this put the fear of God in this government branch and qualify the mother's club to be called a terrorist group even though it was not calling for acts of violence?
Apparently, this is not just a badly worded sentence, because the second paragraph says
Threats from white supremacist and violent antigovernment groups during 2009 have been largely rhetorical and have not indicated plans to carry out violent acts.So, again I am puzzled. A violent antigovernment group is one which has no plans to carry out violent acts? What does this mean? It appears to mean that as an adjective, violent means anything that threatens a very expansive role of government. When the government has been taken over by socialists, as it now has, anyone who opposes socialism is now defined as "violent." This seems to be the criteria for the reporting by some reporters from CNN on the many local Tea Parties on 15 April. One woman CNN reporter was claiming that the protest she was at was no place for a family to be due to its threatening nature, though numerous people were there with their children and there were no acts of violence. Go figure.
A footnote at the bottom of this Key Findings page sort of defines "rightwing extremism." It says
Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.Now this is not actually a definition at all. It does give the impression that if someone hates some other group then they are rightwing. Does this mean that those who hate the rich are rightwing extremists, or would this government agency call them leftwing extremists? Or, rightwing extremists may simply favor state or local government or some concept of minimal government, much as George Washington and Thomas Jefferson did. So, are they trying to say that George, Tom, and I are rightwing extremists and that we should be watched with care because we are (or were) trying to convince others of our viewpoint? Do they have any interest in distinguishing those who oppose illegal immigration and those who simply do not want the U.S. to allow any immigrants to come legally to the U.S.?
There are repeated statements of concern that rightwing extremists continue "to focus on the economy, the perceived loss of U.S. jobs in the manufacturing and construction sectors, and home foreclosures." Heck, there are a lot of people discussing these things. Is there some reason to believe that discussing these topics makes one dangerous?
The report notes
Many rightwing extremists are antagonistic toward the new presidential administration and its perceived stance on a range of issues, including immigration and citizenship, the expansion of social programs to minorities, and restrictions on firearms ownership and use.WELL. I suppose that covers about everyone who did not vote for Obama, except perhaps for the curious reference to minorities. Most social programs for a very long time have been preferentially expanded for the sake of certain minorities. That is not a change at all.
There is a lot of concern that rightwing extremists, whatever they actually may be, are having discussions about important issues and that they are exercising their right to bear arms. It seems that just the act of exercising your right to bear arms is almost alone considered reason to classify someone as a rightwing extremist. This means you are an extremist if you do nothing in violation of the Constitution. Yes, this is a bit odd. Apparently, you are a rightwing extremist if you oppose gun restrictions such as the Brady Law or think that federal law enforcement mishandled the confrontations at Waco, Texas and Ruby Ridge, Idaho.
Then there is the section called "Disgruntled Military Veterans", which I have been since the Democrat Congress stopped supporting South Vietnam, leaving it to fall to North Vietnam and the lives of 56,000 Americans to go for nought, not to mention many more good South Vietnamese. We disgruntled returning soldier's need special watching as enemies of the state.
While "rightwing extremist" was not well-defined, it appears that I clearly am considered a rightwing extremist. Hopefully considered one who is not currently planning violence against the hugely arrogant and overblown federal government or state and local governments. I hope they recognize that I am simply executing my rights to freedom of conscience, freedom of speech, freedom of press, freedom of assembly, freedom of petition, and my property rights. But despite all that, I am to be watched closely as a rightwing extremist because racists and small government people are assumed by our government to be in a state of near kinship. Thanks government. I'm going to add that to my list of grievances! I sure do not trust you anti-Constitutionalist tyrant running dogs either.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Posts
