05 November 2012
Last Electoral College Result Prediction on Presidential Election
I believe the most likely outcome of the Presidential election will be:
Of the generally recognized swing states, the only one that I believe is foolish enough to vote for Obama is Nevada. Nevada showed its perfidy by voting for Senator Harry Reid, who has refused to allow the Senate to obey the law and produce a budget ever since Obama occupied the White House. Harry Reid is wily, but a very wrongheaded man. The state that could send him over and over to the Senate has the good judgment of a Las Vegas labor union. In other words, Nevada is too much like California now, with which state it shares both an astronomical unemployment rate and home foreclosure rate. Sometimes, no oftentimes, the people of a given area suffer mass delusions. I know, I live in the Baltimore - Washington corridor, where mass delusion reigns supreme. I do think there is about a 40% chance that Nevada will vote for the much superior candidate, Romney.
There is about a 20% likelihood that one of the three states, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota will vote for Romney. I believe Romney will win the election with a differential in the percentage total vote of between 2 and 4%. If I am wrong, I think a win by 5% is more likely than one by 1%. A win by 5% will mean that Romney will likely carry at least two of the states Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota. Both Pennsylvania and Michigan will be very hard hit by Obama's plans to shut down the coal-fired electric power plants and both will be hurt by his plans to discourage hydraulic fracturing to release shale oil and gas.
Most of the polls are underestimating the turnout of Republicans and those Independents who have had more than enough of Obama. They are overestimating the turnout of Democrats. This is even true of Rasmussen polls, which are among the best of the polls. The fact that Romney has a normal Republican lead with men and Obama has much less than the normal Democrat lead with women figures very big in my understanding of how this election will turn out. Another key factor is the fact that Independents are decidedly favoring Romney over Obama. There will also be substantially more crossover Democrats voting for Romney than Republicans voting for Obama in this election. These factors have to generally push all of the swing states, most of which are now mostly Republican at the state level, into the Romney column. The work of the Tea Party Americans in ensuring this is also underestimated. The Evangelicals have also become aroused.
Obama is left only with substantial majorities among young people, blacks, and Hispanic Americans. Each of these groups has suffered just unbelievably high unemployment. Falling incomes and rising prices, such as energy prices, have hit blacks and Hispanic Americans especially hard. The fraction of young Americans who favor Obama is high, but usually these young Americans do not vote in large numbers. We will see that many fewer of them will vote in this election than in 2008 and of those who vote, a very substantially larger fraction will vote Republican. The turnout of black and Hispanic Americans will also be lower. The decrease in the fraction who vote for Obama this time as compared to 2008 will be much smaller than that among the young, though it will be greater for Hispanics than blacks.
Now that Americans have had so much time to get to know Obama and to be angered so many times by his lies and deceptions, I am very disappointed that we are still in a situation in which nearly half of all Americans will vote for this con man and failed President. How anyone could want four years of constant attacks on our individual rights and the resulting economic stagnation, is very much beyond my understanding. Romney should have easily surpassed Obama with well over 300 electoral votes. It appears more likely that there are too many very foolish Americans for that to happen. At this point, it looks to me that Romney will get 295 electoral votes.
I will be heartened if Romney comes very close in Minnesota, my birth state, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, however. Coupling that with wins in Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Ohio and the continued shift of the Midwest into the Republican column may be a good sign of things to come. We have already seen these states send more Republicans to their state houses and to the House of Representatives. They have been electing Republican governors as well. The private sector unions have been losing power as they have lost membership. More and more Mid-westerners are learning that if they are to have well-paying jobs, it is good that the governments not be anti-business. As Mid-westerners show more respect for economic freedoms, they will align more with the more reality-interested Republican Party than with the socialist Democratic Party. This re-alignment may take a couple more election cycles to be complete, but it sure is important to America's future freedom and prosperity.
Of the generally recognized swing states, the only one that I believe is foolish enough to vote for Obama is Nevada. Nevada showed its perfidy by voting for Senator Harry Reid, who has refused to allow the Senate to obey the law and produce a budget ever since Obama occupied the White House. Harry Reid is wily, but a very wrongheaded man. The state that could send him over and over to the Senate has the good judgment of a Las Vegas labor union. In other words, Nevada is too much like California now, with which state it shares both an astronomical unemployment rate and home foreclosure rate. Sometimes, no oftentimes, the people of a given area suffer mass delusions. I know, I live in the Baltimore - Washington corridor, where mass delusion reigns supreme. I do think there is about a 40% chance that Nevada will vote for the much superior candidate, Romney.
There is about a 20% likelihood that one of the three states, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota will vote for Romney. I believe Romney will win the election with a differential in the percentage total vote of between 2 and 4%. If I am wrong, I think a win by 5% is more likely than one by 1%. A win by 5% will mean that Romney will likely carry at least two of the states Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Minnesota. Both Pennsylvania and Michigan will be very hard hit by Obama's plans to shut down the coal-fired electric power plants and both will be hurt by his plans to discourage hydraulic fracturing to release shale oil and gas.
Most of the polls are underestimating the turnout of Republicans and those Independents who have had more than enough of Obama. They are overestimating the turnout of Democrats. This is even true of Rasmussen polls, which are among the best of the polls. The fact that Romney has a normal Republican lead with men and Obama has much less than the normal Democrat lead with women figures very big in my understanding of how this election will turn out. Another key factor is the fact that Independents are decidedly favoring Romney over Obama. There will also be substantially more crossover Democrats voting for Romney than Republicans voting for Obama in this election. These factors have to generally push all of the swing states, most of which are now mostly Republican at the state level, into the Romney column. The work of the Tea Party Americans in ensuring this is also underestimated. The Evangelicals have also become aroused.
Obama is left only with substantial majorities among young people, blacks, and Hispanic Americans. Each of these groups has suffered just unbelievably high unemployment. Falling incomes and rising prices, such as energy prices, have hit blacks and Hispanic Americans especially hard. The fraction of young Americans who favor Obama is high, but usually these young Americans do not vote in large numbers. We will see that many fewer of them will vote in this election than in 2008 and of those who vote, a very substantially larger fraction will vote Republican. The turnout of black and Hispanic Americans will also be lower. The decrease in the fraction who vote for Obama this time as compared to 2008 will be much smaller than that among the young, though it will be greater for Hispanics than blacks.
Now that Americans have had so much time to get to know Obama and to be angered so many times by his lies and deceptions, I am very disappointed that we are still in a situation in which nearly half of all Americans will vote for this con man and failed President. How anyone could want four years of constant attacks on our individual rights and the resulting economic stagnation, is very much beyond my understanding. Romney should have easily surpassed Obama with well over 300 electoral votes. It appears more likely that there are too many very foolish Americans for that to happen. At this point, it looks to me that Romney will get 295 electoral votes.
I will be heartened if Romney comes very close in Minnesota, my birth state, Michigan, and Pennsylvania, however. Coupling that with wins in Iowa, Wisconsin, Indiana, and Ohio and the continued shift of the Midwest into the Republican column may be a good sign of things to come. We have already seen these states send more Republicans to their state houses and to the House of Representatives. They have been electing Republican governors as well. The private sector unions have been losing power as they have lost membership. More and more Mid-westerners are learning that if they are to have well-paying jobs, it is good that the governments not be anti-business. As Mid-westerners show more respect for economic freedoms, they will align more with the more reality-interested Republican Party than with the socialist Democratic Party. This re-alignment may take a couple more election cycles to be complete, but it sure is important to America's future freedom and prosperity.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment