And Robert also says:
I have long maintained that most of the people who claim they believe in catastrophic man-made global warming and a scientific consensus that it is a proven theory, do not have a coherent understanding of the science or the economics to rationally support their beliefs.
For instance, those scientists said to constitute the consensus cannot even agree on the scientific basis for the claims themselves. Those who create the climate computer models produce results which are highly divergent from one another and also highly divergent from reality.
There is a very good reason for this. They do not understand the physics of the atmosphere and thermal radiation. Their ideas are commonly in error and the very principles of physics they say they believe in are not consistently applied. The resultant theories produced by those scientists who even try to put forth a theory have an incredible number of combinations of errors.
Given the bias toward catastrophic man-made global warming, any output that concludes there is significant warming due to carbon dioxide or other man-made infrared-active gases is said to support the consensus. Garbage in -- dogma out. There is no scientific consensus at all.