02 July 2017
Throwing Away Jobs Under the Paris Climate Accord
Obama deposited about $1 billion in the Green Climate Fund for less developed nations as part of an initial U.S. payment of $3 billion he had scheduled under the Paris Climate Accord without authorization from Congress. This unauthorized $1 billion was the equivalent of throwing away 20,000 American jobs at $50,000 per job. Had he managed to pilfer the full $3 billion, he would have destroyed 60,000 American jobs.
It gets worse. The U.S. obligation for the Green Climate Fund under the Paris Climate Accord not authorized by the Senate as required by the U.S. Constitution was supposed to grow to $23 billion a year. The rest of the developed nations were supposed to provide enough transfer money to the undeveloped nations to create an annual transfer of $100 billion a year. The American contribution was the equivalent of destroying 460,000 American jobs.
Then on top of those plans to kill jobs, Obama and his party killed many a coal miner's job, jobs of those who transport coal, jobs of coal-fired power plant operators, jobs of those whose jobs depended on inexpensive and reliable power, and those who served all of these people with their needs. He also prevented oil and gas drilling on public lands, prevented the building of pipelines, and planned to harass those providing us with the many benefits of the Shale Oil and Gas Revolution. He backed mandates and unrealistic dangers to suppress fossil fuel extraction and use generally, driving up all energy costs. His backing of the Paris Climate Accord was meant to serve as a means to apply pressure on the American people to put up with rising energy costs and the inconveniences of energy unreliability.
Obama and the Democrats sure worked hard to create American jobs! What friends they were to the American worker. Is it any wonder that the fraction of Americans with jobs is so low and those with jobs have gone so long without real pay increases. The suppression of energy use was clearly going to destroy jobs and slow down the growth of future employment opportunities. It was clearly going to reduce the growth of the American standard of living. When you view man as the monster destroying the planet, of course you are going to want to destroy the monster. This is exactly what Obama and the Democrats are bent on doing. It is an intention to do great evil.
Man is not evil. Man is the best there is in reality and the universe. There is no other measure of the good, but that which is good for the life of each and every individual human being. The standard of living, whether measured by human security and survival or by human flourishing, is highly dependent upon our freedom to use energy. An article in the Washington Post a couple of days ago bemoaned the fact that low income Americans would suffer the most due to "Climate Change." Of course, low income people are always the most vulnerable to suffering natural disasters. They are also most vulnerable to suffering from the lost jobs I wrote about above. They are the ones who will suffer the most in the long run if the American economy does not grow at a healthy rate. If the American economy grows at a good and compounded rate over the years, any climate change that may happen in 2100 will be much more easily dealt with by a generally much more wealthy nation of people. Taking advantage of our unbelievable wealth in fossil fuels to grow our economy and make all of the technological advances that allows, is the very best way to deal with the vicissitudes of nature. Who knows, we may have another Ice Age descend on us by 2100.
Suppressing the freedom to use energy is a severely evil act. That act is justified as a means to save nature or to save the planet, but neither is a value without man. And, frankly, the wealthier and more developed our civilizations have become, the more they value nature and act to prevent its destruction. This is not an either or choice. We should not do harm to man because we are deceived into thinking it is. Fortunately, Trump has turned away from the evils of the Paris Climate Accord.
It gets worse. The U.S. obligation for the Green Climate Fund under the Paris Climate Accord not authorized by the Senate as required by the U.S. Constitution was supposed to grow to $23 billion a year. The rest of the developed nations were supposed to provide enough transfer money to the undeveloped nations to create an annual transfer of $100 billion a year. The American contribution was the equivalent of destroying 460,000 American jobs.
Then on top of those plans to kill jobs, Obama and his party killed many a coal miner's job, jobs of those who transport coal, jobs of coal-fired power plant operators, jobs of those whose jobs depended on inexpensive and reliable power, and those who served all of these people with their needs. He also prevented oil and gas drilling on public lands, prevented the building of pipelines, and planned to harass those providing us with the many benefits of the Shale Oil and Gas Revolution. He backed mandates and unrealistic dangers to suppress fossil fuel extraction and use generally, driving up all energy costs. His backing of the Paris Climate Accord was meant to serve as a means to apply pressure on the American people to put up with rising energy costs and the inconveniences of energy unreliability.
Obama and the Democrats sure worked hard to create American jobs! What friends they were to the American worker. Is it any wonder that the fraction of Americans with jobs is so low and those with jobs have gone so long without real pay increases. The suppression of energy use was clearly going to destroy jobs and slow down the growth of future employment opportunities. It was clearly going to reduce the growth of the American standard of living. When you view man as the monster destroying the planet, of course you are going to want to destroy the monster. This is exactly what Obama and the Democrats are bent on doing. It is an intention to do great evil.
Man is not evil. Man is the best there is in reality and the universe. There is no other measure of the good, but that which is good for the life of each and every individual human being. The standard of living, whether measured by human security and survival or by human flourishing, is highly dependent upon our freedom to use energy. An article in the Washington Post a couple of days ago bemoaned the fact that low income Americans would suffer the most due to "Climate Change." Of course, low income people are always the most vulnerable to suffering natural disasters. They are also most vulnerable to suffering from the lost jobs I wrote about above. They are the ones who will suffer the most in the long run if the American economy does not grow at a healthy rate. If the American economy grows at a good and compounded rate over the years, any climate change that may happen in 2100 will be much more easily dealt with by a generally much more wealthy nation of people. Taking advantage of our unbelievable wealth in fossil fuels to grow our economy and make all of the technological advances that allows, is the very best way to deal with the vicissitudes of nature. Who knows, we may have another Ice Age descend on us by 2100.
Suppressing the freedom to use energy is a severely evil act. That act is justified as a means to save nature or to save the planet, but neither is a value without man. And, frankly, the wealthier and more developed our civilizations have become, the more they value nature and act to prevent its destruction. This is not an either or choice. We should not do harm to man because we are deceived into thinking it is. Fortunately, Trump has turned away from the evils of the Paris Climate Accord.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment