The Clinton Foundation has large contributors from Ukraine, Russia, Saudia Arabia, and other Middle Eastern countries. In view of the following observations, why are wealthy people from these countries giving money to the Clinton Foundation?
- These countries are not very keen on women's rights, environmentalism, or catastrophic man-made global warming.
- There is so much need for charity in work within these countries that they ought to donate their money locally.
- Large donors do their homework to find out what the charity pass-through rate is. If they are really interested in doing charity work, they will not accept a 6.4% pass-through rate to actual charitable aid.
Then Hillary compounded the bad perception by actually approving the take-over of a company that provides 20% of the U.S. uranium needs by Russian interests with close ties to Putin. Our extensive aid to Ukraine is now subject to being questioned as the result of bribes, rather than as a result of our national interest as well. I expect we will learn about many other questionable decisions now that this Clinton Foundation is in the spotlight.
Any rational individual will be greatly influenced by the past history of immorality exhibited by the Clintons in assessing the likelihood that they were actually influenced by these bribes to make decisions that might be contrary to the national interest of the United States.