The Representative of my incredibly gerrymandered Congressional District in Maryland is the socialist John Sarbanes, son of the former Maryland Senator. He has just sent out a letter to his constituents in which he complains that:
In
the
2012
election
cycle
alone,
big
interests
such
as
the
oil
and
gas
industry
and
Wall
Street
contributed
hundreds
of
millions
of
dollars
to
Congressional
campaigns
and
equally
vast
sums
to
lobbying
groups.
Meanwhile,
upwards
of
$1.3
billion
poured
in
from
Super
PACs
and
“dark
money”
groups
that
float
outside
the
reaches
of
our
campaign
finance
laws.
He has just proposed the following new law:
That’s
why
I
am
introducing
the
Government
By
the
People
Act.
This
sensible
and
straightforward
piece
of
legislation
will
do
the
following.
First,
it
will
encourage
the
participation
of
everyday
Americans
in
the
funding
of
campaigns
by
providing
a
refundable
$25
My
Voice
Tax
Credit.
This
will
bring
the
voices
of
the
broad
public
into
the
funding
side
of
campaigns
and
democratize
the
relationship
between
money
and
speech.
Second,
the
bill
will
establish
a
Freedom
From
Influence
Matching
Fund
to
boost
the
power
of
small-dollar
contributions.
To
be
eligible
for
these
matching
funds,
a
candidate
must
agree
to
a
limit
on
large
donations
and
must
demonstrate
broad-based
support
from
a
network
of
small-dollar
contributors.
Amplified
by
the
Freedom
From
Influence
matching
fund,
the
voices
of
everyday
Americans
would
be
just
as
powerful
as
the
voices
of
the
big
donors.
Third,
the
Government
By
the
People
Act
will
provide
candidates
with
an
opportunity
to
earn
additional
resources
in
the
home
stretch
of
a
campaign
so
that
the
voices
of
the
people
are
not
completely
drowned
out
by
Super
PACs
and
other
dark
money
interests.
In
the
wake
of
the
Citizens
United
decision,
this
kind
of
support
is
critical
to
ensuring
that
citizen-backed
candidates
have
staying
power.
We
can
pay
for
these
changes
just
by
closing
a
few
of
the
tax
and
regulatory
loopholes
that
are
the
decades-old
legacy
of
special
interest
influence
in
Congress.
It’s
only
fair
that
those
who
are
responsible
for
breaking
the
policy-making
machinery
in
Washington
should
bear
the
cost
of
fixing
it.
It is very strange
that he did not mention such special interest groups as trial lawyers,
teachers, labor unions, environmental groups, feminist groups, Black
American groups, and Hispanic groups. Will his legislation equally
suppress their freedom of speech as will his attempt to make taxes more
unfavorable for groups who do not always reliably support Democrats? It is clear that the only way to get the taxes to pay for this is to attack businesses and milk them. His legislation can hardly acquire the funding it needs from labor unions, non-profit environmental, feminist, Black, and Hispanic groups. This proposal is a very clearly anti-business proposal and makes no attempt at all to control many special interest groups. What it does is force businesses to fund anti-business special interests.
The
reason government is controlled by special interests is because
government is too large for the People to understand what it is doing
and how to control it. Special interests step into the power vacuum and
take over. The People are frustrated with this situation, yet many do
not understand that inherent in excessive government is control by
special interests. Good government limits itself to protecting the
rights of the individual and is much, much smaller and much, much easier
for the People to understand and control.
Big
Government cannot be for the people or by the people. Many will reject
it with disgust because it tries to dictate what values the individual
may pursue and will micromanage their lives. Many others will actually
want it to do more for them, but will be frustrated by what it does and
unable to figure out how to make it do what they think is right. Big
Government can never be loved or even tolerated by the People. Their
present disgust is entirely understandable. John Sarbanes proposed law is
nothing but a veil to hide the real problem: the excessive size and
scope of governmental power.
No comments:
Post a Comment