03 February 2017
Thoughts on Collectivists and Progressive Elitists from Notes to a Friend
In the reaction to President Trump's efforts to reduce the scope of government, some key characteristics of the collectivists, socialists, and Progressive Elitists are more openly clear than usual.
The socialists are going berserk. Hysteria is a key component of socialism. The madness of crowds, the imagined evils of business, the fears for the environment, the dislike for mankind and man's need to control his environment, the dislike for unequal accomplishment and award, fear of uncertainty, and the fear of being independent or of having to think independently. Hysteria, alarmism, fear -- they all make the socialist want to trust his life and its care to government and to the collective.
Collectivists and Progressive Elitists are known to be less charitable than conservatives are and I am sure than libertarians are as well. They look into their own souls and they see a lack of benevolence. They are ashamed. They seek a cheap and easy way to convince themselves that they are benevolent. By using the force of government, they can choose the causes of "benevolent" action and dilute the cost to themselves in time and money by making everyone contribute to their chosen causes. Despite putting a gun to the head of others to achieve their goal, they convince themselves to an extent that they are now benevolent, but that conviction is most uncertain and uneasy. It is difficult to completely evade the fact that they have done harm to some in order to fill the hole in their own souls. They are cursed with at least the vague notion, that unlike them, the good man finds it easy and natural to view most other men in a benevolent manner because he sees introspectively his own good and noble soul and naturally tends to project that evaluation of what it is to be a man onto others.
The socialists are going berserk. Hysteria is a key component of socialism. The madness of crowds, the imagined evils of business, the fears for the environment, the dislike for mankind and man's need to control his environment, the dislike for unequal accomplishment and award, fear of uncertainty, and the fear of being independent or of having to think independently. Hysteria, alarmism, fear -- they all make the socialist want to trust his life and its care to government and to the collective.
Collectivists and Progressive Elitists are known to be less charitable than conservatives are and I am sure than libertarians are as well. They look into their own souls and they see a lack of benevolence. They are ashamed. They seek a cheap and easy way to convince themselves that they are benevolent. By using the force of government, they can choose the causes of "benevolent" action and dilute the cost to themselves in time and money by making everyone contribute to their chosen causes. Despite putting a gun to the head of others to achieve their goal, they convince themselves to an extent that they are now benevolent, but that conviction is most uncertain and uneasy. It is difficult to completely evade the fact that they have done harm to some in order to fill the hole in their own souls. They are cursed with at least the vague notion, that unlike them, the good man finds it easy and natural to view most other men in a benevolent manner because he sees introspectively his own good and noble soul and naturally tends to project that evaluation of what it is to be a man onto others.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment