According to Rep. Smith:
The American people have every right to be suspicious when NOAA alters data to get the politically correct results they want and then refuses to reveal how those decisions were made.As a recent editorial in Investors Business Daily says:
Taxpayers pay for this research, which is being used to justify massive new federal spending and regulation. They deserve to know what NOAA and other federal agencies are doing — and whether they're being honest or serving an unspoken extreme political agenda.Indeed, it is way past time that the Obama administration should be stopped from exaggerating claims of catastrophic man-made global warming simply by manipulating the data to systematically lower past temperatures and to raise recent temperatures. NOAA and NASA GISS have both long been engaged in this fraud and have not been held responsible for their corruption of science and their lawless activities. These activities have then fed the data mill that the Obama EPA has used to claim that CO2 is a terrible pollutant. It is no such thing. It is in fact absolutely necessary for life on Earth by virtue of the need of plants for it and our need of plants. It is the use of CO2 by plants that produces the oxygen in the atmosphere that animals, including man, require. Yet the Obama EPA has the gall to call this life-essential molecule a pollutant based on the fudging of data by NOAA and NASA GISS!
Posts
