I was recently commenting on the repeal of ObamaCare in response to an article on-line at the Foundation for Economic Education and said that ObamaCare was a sad case of one-size-fits all. An anonymous pest named D G then called me stupid for not knowing that there are three plan levels in ObamaCare. Of course, I did know that there are four plan levels, but one could say that I did somewhat exaggerate in the one-size-fits all. But, really only a little bit as will be apparent in my discussion of how Obama, Reid, and Pelosi had planned to pass the Comrade Pants Act, but they lost control of the House and the Senate due to the reaction against ObamaCare before they could carry out their plans.
Recognizing that pants are very important to the welfare of Americans and that some people did not have pants of sufficient quality to meet the standards of Democrat politicians and bureaucrats, Obama and his party in Congress decided that something had to be done about this. Of course they were quite busy with passing ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank so they were running badly behind schedule in pushing the Comrade Pants Act through Congress. It was a race against time also, because they knew they were about to lose their legislative majorities, having sacrificed it to the principle that the government held ownership rights in everyone's mind and body, thus allowing them to dictate the means of maintaining everyone's mind and body. Pants were important, but what could in principle be as important as that mind and body collective ownership principle?
So the Senate had had a thousand-page act thrown together by pants manufacturers, cloth makers, pants manufacturing equipment makers, haberdashers, egalitarian professional agitators, and their Senate staff members. None of the Senators had had time to read the act, but they knew there would be more time to do that after the act was passed. Now there was a problem -- the act had tax penalties in it for anyone who wore pants that were not up to the standards set in the act. Well, more precisely most of the standards were to be set up by federal government bureaucrats. Those penalties would also have to be levied on anyone who did not purchase the required pants as well. But constitutionally, all legislation levying taxes, tariffs, and other fees has to originate in the House of Representatives. So how could they satisfy this requirement without starting over, which time did not allow? Simple. They stripped out all but the bill number of a bill passed in the House to establish National Lollipop Day, changing the name of the bill to the Pant-wearer Protection and Affordable Pants Act, colloquially known as the Comrade Pants Act. They poured the Senate act text into it and passed this act in the Senate after sufficient non-citizen votes were cast for Al Franken to allow the Senate to do so. By then, the House did not have time to approve the act that resulted from reconciliation of the PPAPA and the National Lollipop Day texts. Usually a reconciliation can be performed quickly, but the differences in the two texts were just a bit too much for the remaining time before recess.
While all of this legislative activity was carried out at a frenzied pace, Obama and Pelosi had been telling the American people over and over that if they liked their pants they could keep them. It they liked their pants providers, they could keep them also. They also said that because pant making equipment was to become standardized, as were the patterns and styles, the cost of pants would drop. Everyone could efficiently examine them on on-line exchanges and purchase them there under competition among many pants suppliers, once they provided their social security numbers and credit card information to the government with its well-known regard for the security of their information. People with qualifying incomes would receive subsidies for their critical pant purchases, while people with higher incomes would pay full price. People who bought many pants with subsidies were thus supported by those who bought pants at full price, but of course those people who bought many pants must have needed them and it was recognized that need was an irrefutable claim on the labor and income of others. Tax forms were to have a new line. It was the shared pants responsibility line that one had to fill out proving that one had either purchased pants on-line from one of the pants exchanges or that pants from any other source met the specifications for what was deemed good pants by the Department of Health and Human Services.
The Democratic Party did not want to be criticized for forcing everyone to wear a single pant size, so they set up four levels of pants that one could purchase. The Act itself was vague about what distinguished these pants levels, but the bureaucrats anticipated the House passing the legislation and rapidly filled out the requirements.
Platinum Level: 44-inch waist, 40-inch in-seam, wool cloth, gray, pockets both front and back, six pair a year.
Gold Level: 40-inch waist, 36-inch in-seam, linen cloth, cream-color, pockets in back only, four pair a year.
Silver Level: 36-inch waist, 32-inch in-seam, denim cloth, blue, pockets in front only, 2 pair a year.
Bronze Level: 32-inch waist, 28-inch in-seam, polyester cloth, pink, no pockets, 1 pair a year.
As you can see, this is not a one-size-fits-all law. There is all the accommodation for different needs that any comrade might reasonably have. All you have to do is sign onto the federal pants exchange in your state and choose your bronze, silver, gold, or platinum pant plan. What could possibly be wrong with this?
To this day there are many Democrats who bemoan the failure to pass the Comrade Pants Act. That act was so going to address everyone's pants needs and in the process make us all a little more equal. Of course, this was just a second step in this quest for equality. There were many more goods and services to which the Democratic Socialist Party planned to apply the same legislative methods.
20 Feb 2017 Update: It has recently been suggested that the government having established the right to force individuals to buy a product or service should now force the People to buy Ivanka's clothing line. As we know from ObamaCare, this requirement must be implemented without regard for the individual's sex, age, or personal needs. So guys, line up and select your Ivanka clothing of choice! The choices will only diminish with time.
No comments:
Post a Comment