tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8959556.post1810577738494838583..comments2024-02-21T17:30:40.448-05:00Comments on An Objectivist Individualist: EPA endangerment finding endangers USA by Dennis T. AveryCharles R. Anderson, Ph.D.http://www.blogger.com/profile/09610765984333672076noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8959556.post-26493543062668354532017-10-31T01:59:08.415-05:002017-10-31T01:59:08.415-05:00I am in full agreement with your comment.I am in full agreement with your comment.Charles R. Anderson, Ph.D.https://www.blogger.com/profile/09610765984333672076noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8959556.post-4486883794585080572017-10-30T16:01:31.887-05:002017-10-30T16:01:31.887-05:00They didn't even make an honest endangerment f...They didn't even make an honest endangerment finding. They did not find that CO2 was a threat to human health. They said it was a threat to climate - and said that climate change was a threat to human health. But that's not a valid use of their commission. They were not commissioned to control the climate (as if we could - and CO2 does not determine climate to start with; location does). The endangerment finding is all based on smoke and mirrors. The endangerment finding is based on fraudulent use of the EPA's commission because atmospheric CO2 is not a hazard to anything or anyone. It doesn't matter if it would cause climate change - they did not have the authority to regulate it because it's not a pollutant.4TimesAYearhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16954044418663503620noreply@blogger.com